Little League Debate |
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2006 June 2005 July 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog MY LINKS Cao's Blog You Can't Change My Stripes by Red Tigress  Defy The Herald The Metropolis Times Daschle v. Thune ConservaPundit Uberblog Of Anti-liberalism The Black Day 9/11 Remember The Blood of Heros Just My Opinion...But I'm Right The Spirit of America! The Electoral College For todays dose of choice "libertarian" topics see Dr. Forbush Thinks JB's Sanctuary Carson City Toyota  49er Hater Society 
|
posted by: therealspartacus007 (reply) post date: 09.29.04 (2:28 pm) This debate could easily decide the election as much as the Bush v Kerry "debate" (really a joint press conference) will- Badnarik is projected to get up to 5% of the votes in NM and NV, and Cobb's Green Party will likely take more votes away from Bush than Kerry this year, as Nader's supporters are voting for him again and even in 2000 there were nearly as many Republicans voting Green as Democrats. posted by: Stephen89702 (reply) post date: 09.29.04 (3:12 pm) Strange that Ralph Nader wasn't invited - or maybe he was and declined. The Libertarian party always drains off Republican voters dissatified with the leftward drift of their party. These people have cost the Republicans some very close elections and will do so again this year. The Green party ... I think mostly they take votes away from the Democrats. But this year may be different, again due to conservatives upset with the Republican party. posted by: LenKutchma (reply) post date: 09.29.04 (3:43 pm) It's easy for people like Badnarik to say the US should cut and run but that would defeat the entire purpose of going in there to begin with - namely to remove a brutal dictator from power, to remove a very real threat to the security of the region and hence the world and the return of very basic human rights and dignities to the Iraqi people. To leave now would be disastorous, as the Iranians would be guaranteed certain victory in their current insurgency. Which threat is worse, the one posed by the secular regime of Saddam or the Radical Islamic regime of Iran? |
   THIS IS A "NO UN" ZONE
|
||||||||||
