| Hillary 2008 |
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2006 June 2005 July 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog MY LINKS Cao's Blog You Can't Change My Stripes by Red Tigress  Defy The Herald The Metropolis Times Daschle v. Thune ConservaPundit Uberblog Of Anti-liberalism The Black Day 9/11 Remember The Blood of Heros Just My Opinion...But I'm Right The Spirit of America! The Electoral College For todays dose of choice "libertarian" topics see Dr. Forbush Thinks JB's Sanctuary Carson City Toyota  49er Hater Society 
|
posted by: LynnKramer (reply) post date: 04.18.05 (10:38 am) I feel that there are better ways in which to disseminate the following information, but this letter will have to suffice. Here's a quick review: Many people are incredulous when I tell them that Sen. Hilliary R Clinton IV intends to pursue an immature agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever. "How could Sen. Clinton be so unambitious?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is indeed possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Sen. Clinton plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that this is a free country, and I claim we ought to keep it that way. While perhaps offensive to some readers, only a direct quote can fully convey the passive-aggressive nature and content of her anecdotes: "Attention, fans! Your orders are to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that she may be generating, and to do so at any cost." I would truly like to comment on Sen. Clinton's attempt to associate vandalism with colonialism. There is no association. Sen. Clinton has been deluding people into believing that my bitterness at her is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. Don't let her delude you, too. One might think that her positions have no credibility. While that's true, it does somewhat miss the point. You see, we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Sen. Clinton's annoying, childish activities, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to demand a thoughtful analysis and resolution of our problems with Sen. Clinton.) You don't have to say anything specifically about her for her to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding her supercilious self-fulfilling prophecies. If I may be so bold, all Sen. Clinton really wants is to hang onto the perks she's getting from the system. That's all she really cares about. This may be a foregone conclusion, but we must strike at the heart of her efforts to destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that Sen. Clinton's jibes may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into satanic, meretricious jujuism. Sen. Clinton's ignorant attempts to debunk myths often lead to the perpetuation of them, which makes it obvious to me that life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is Sen. Clinton so compelled to complain about situations over which she has no control? I mean, I feel that Sen. Clinton has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. She obviously has none, or she wouldn't promote violence in all its forms -- physical, sexual, psychological, economical, and social. Before I continue, let me state that if she thinks that unilateralism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us, then she's sadly mistaken. Sen. Clinton argues that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. To maintain this thesis, Sen. Clinton naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which she does by the desperate expedient of claiming that her campaigns are Holy Writ. I would like to close by saying that Sen. Hilliary R Clinton IV is hardly the first proponent of jealous antidisestablishmentarianism and she is unlikely to be the last. posted by: right-lioness (reply) post date: 04.19.05 (3:07 pm) Reply to: LynnKramer hillary clinton is nothing but a tabloid-gossip insult news (unworthy?) to woman's integrity wish that mrs. cheney would run against h. clinton! (((wink)))) posted by: Stephen89702 (reply) post date: 04.21.05 (8:15 am) Reply to: LynnKramer I am guessing by your comment that you don't care much for Hillary. posted by: LynnKramer (reply) post date: 04.22.05 (5:03 am) Stephan: I have written that I think liberalism is a sin. I wish it weere a crime. |
   THIS IS A "NO UN" ZONE
|
||||||||||
